During their employment, the plaintiffs (and other California Class Members) were allegedly required to use their personal cellular phones, personal vehicles, and personal home offices to complete their necessary job duties. The pending lawsuit alleges that SAS Retail Services failed to reimburse employees for required business expenses in violation of California Labor Code §2802. The defendant in the case, SAS Retail Services LLC, SAS Retail Services LLC, operates out of California developing merchandising service programs for some of the nation's largest retailers and consumer brands. The plaintiffs filed the class action for themselves and others in similar circumstances at SAS Retail Services, seeking compensation for their losses. Based on their classifications, both Seaman and Rose were entitled to legally required meal and rest periods, minimum wage payment, and overtime wages. Rose was also employed by SAS Retail Services in California since June 2018 and was classified as a non-exempt employee and paid hourly. Seaman was employed by SAS Retail Services in California from November 2019 through February 2022, classified as a non-exempt employee and paid hourly. The plaintiffs in the case, Epiphany Seaman and Courtney Rose, filed a class action complaint alleging multiple California employment law violations and demanding a jury trial. The Case No.: 30-2022-01286330-CU-OE-CXC The Plaintiff: Seaman and Rose v. In recent news, SAS Retail Services faces allegations that they violated California employment law when they failed to reimburse their employees for business expenses. Contact Contact Form Los Angeles San Diego San Francisco Sacramento Riverside Orange County Santa Clara Chicago Phoenix Albuquerque Las Vegas Honolulu.Practice Areas Overtime Unemployment Retaliation Discrimination Fair Credit Reporting Act Wage & Hour Termination Class Action Job Benefits Labor Laws Monsanto Roundup Case Volkswagen Litigation Luxottica Case.Attorneys Norm Blumenthal Aj Bhowmik Kyle Nordrehaug Piya Mukherjee Nicholas De Blouw Victoria Rivapalacio Jeffrey Herman Ricardo Ehmann Charlotte James Andrew Ronan Christine LeVu Scott Blumenthal Sergio Julian Puche Trevor Moran Randy Hy.By Job Title Field Case Managers Account Executives Assistant Managers Claims Examiners Real Estate Appraisers.Case Info Firm Resume Court Docs Class Notices Published Cases Landmark Cases.The firm has a statewide practice of representing employees on a contingency basis for violations involving unpaid wages, overtime pay, discrimination, harassment, wrongful termination, and other types of illegal workplace conduct.SAS Retail Services, LLC Faces Allegations they Failed to Reimburse Employees for Expenses - Free Legal Advice | California Labor Laws | Employment Lawyers Blumenthal Nodrehaug & Bhowmik Allegedly, the incentive program was described to potential and new employees as part of the compensation package.įor more information about the class action lawsuit against SAS Retail Services, LLC, call (800) 568-8020 to speak to an experienced California employment attorney today.īlumenthal Nordrehaug Bhowmik De Blouw LLP is a labor law firm with law offices located in San Diego County, Riverside County, Los Angeles County, Sacramento County, Santa Clara County, Orange County, and San Francisco County. Plaintiff received a non-discretionary bonus that was allegedly not calculated into the regular rate of pay, which resulted in an alleged underpayment of minimum and overtime wages. California Labor Code §2802 expressly states that "an employer shall indemnify his or her employee for all necessary expenditures or losses incurred by the employee in direct consequence of the discharge of his or her duties." During employment, Plaintiff and other California Class Members were allegedly required to use their personal cellular phones, personal vehicles and personal home offices as a result of and in furtherance of their job duties.Īdditionally, the lawsuit alleges Defendant underpaid minimum and overtime wages to Plaintiff and other California Class Members by failing to pay such wages at the regular rate of pay. SAS Retail Services, LLC allegedly failed to reimburse employees for required business expenses. To read a copy of the Complaint, please click here. The lawsuit against SAS Retail Services, LLC is currently pending in the Orange County Superior Court, Case No. 3, 2022 /PRNewswire-PRWeb/ - The Los Angeles employment law attorneys, at Blumenthal Nordrehaug Bhowmik De Blouw LLP, filed a class action lawsuit against SAS Retail Services, LLC alleging the company violated the California Labor Code. SAS Retail Services, LLC allegedly failed to reimburse employees for business expenses that were required to complete job duties.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |